Editorial #240: Good News! Two Autism Schools in Two Years Have Problems!
Autism Politico is pleased to hear that a private autism school has lost accreditation and another one has closed within the past two years.
The story is a pretty extensive one, but we will focus on three small paragraphs of a very long article:
John Locke Academy, a mainstream high school, and the special needs School of Autistic Healing, opened as companion schools two years ago. They are largely run by the family of Bob Jones, the real estate developer blamed by many teachers and parents for the August 2008 closure of Utah Southvalley Community School (USC), a Murray private school formerly known as Woodland Hills.
Jones had acquired the financially strapped Woodland Hills, for children with Asperger’s syndrome and other cognitive and behavioral impairments, a year earlier and hoped to revive it, partly through introducing a comprehensive sports program. But the school suffered rapid teacher turnover — at least 50 teachers quit or were fired in one year — and some parents complained about the new focus on athletics.
The “School of Autistic Healing” is a silly name for a school seeing as how no government agency will state that there is a cure for autism. “Healing” implies that there is a way to a cure.
With regard to athletics, as we know, some autistics may suffer problems with coordination. Having them play sports if they don’t want to might cause them to feel even more inept that they already do. That a school would not understand this goes to show how little they know about autism.
At the time, Jones argued he had kept the school from closing and lost his own money in the process. In March 2009, he filed for bankruptcy, leaving behind $6.5 million in debts both from his real estate ventures and USC. The Utah Office of Debt Collection reports there are still 30 outstanding cases for unpaid wages to school employees.
That he invested his own money is nice, but considering the debts the ultimate fate of this man’s adventures, it’s best that the school closed before the attendees came to suffer from lack of proper funding. This is not to imply that the students would have suffered, but it appears from this story that the person behind the two schools doesn’t have much knowledge about autism or how to deal with autistics.
Replies to this editorial are welcome.
Editorial #238: Planking – The Newest Social Stupidity
Autism Politico has learned that another stupid social craze is hitting the world. It’s called planking, and at least one person has died from it.
“Planking involves someone lying flat on their stomach with their arms against their bodies in unusual and sometimes dangerous situations, with photographs of their exploits shared through social media sites.”
Whoopie! It seems that as far as being social goes, the dumber the act you engage in, the more popular you are considered to be. If you are on the autism spectrum and get picked on because you are socially inept, aren’t you glad you are autistic so you don’t have to do such silly things to be accepted by your friends?
“This morning we have seen a young man take this activity a step further and attempt to plank on a balcony. Unfortunately he has tragically fallen to his death,” Queensland Police Deputy Commissioner Ross Barnett said.
Hmm. People are also “planking” in other dangerous locations, but Autism Politico won’t list them here because we don’t want to give people ideas.
“Police issued warnings of the dangers … but the publicity only seemed to fuel the fad.”
How very social of the public to disregard such warnings. If being cool and popular supersedes what the police say, it seems that this is the way people want to go.
“Last week, a 20-year-old, also in Queensland state, was arrested after being allegedly found “planking” on a police car. He was charged with being on police equipment without lawful excuse.”
Serves him right if he broke the law.
Replies to this editorial are welcome.
Editorial #237: Stem Cell Clinic Closes After Baby Death
Autism Politico is aware that
Europe’s largest stem cell clinic, which is at the centre of a scandal over the death of a baby given an injection into the brain, has been shut down.
What does this have to do with autism? Well…
Experts in stem cell research had accused the clinic of preying on vulnerable patients, desperately seeking a cure for such illnesses and diseases as cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, autism, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, heart disease, diabetes and spinal cord injuries.
As usual, Autism Politico is of the opinion that parents who wish use treatments not approved of by their governments on their children should try these treatments on themselves first. We hold this opinion because we know that any parent who loves their child wouldn’t think of subjecting their children to treatments which are not only potentially fatal, but are also not government approved.
Or maybe we’re wrong…
The clinic had come under increasing scrutiny following the death of an 18-month-old boy in August last year, in a case first revealed by The Sunday Telegraph. The child, who was from Romania, was injected in the brain with stem cells but suffered internal bleeding. Three months earlier, a boy aged 10 from Azerbaijan had almost died when the same procedure went wrong.
You never know what parents will do. But Autism Politico wonders if there is some kind of diagnosis in the DSM IV that describes parents who do such things? Will the parents who brought their children to the clinic be charged with child endangerment?
Replies to this editorial are welcome.
Editorial #236: When Is a Minority Not a Minority?
Autism Politico is aware that there is an autism advocacy group out there who wants the United Nations to declare autistics a minority group. The movement started a long time ago when 1 in 166 people had some form of autism.
Over the years, the figure has changed as more and more people become diagnosed.
In South Korea, it is now believed that 1 in 38 kids have some form of autism.
A study in South Korea suggests about 1 in 38 children have traits of autism, higher than a previous U.S. estimate of 1 in 100.
Of course part of this study was based on a parental survey, and we all know that parents are the least objective when evaluating their own children. However, assuming the results are true…
Autism advocates and autism advocacy organizations should be campaigning to have the following groups granted minority status:
Sickle-cell anemia because it affects 1 in every 500 African-American births and 1 in every 1000 to 1400 Hispanic-American births.
Cystic Fibrosis because it affects 1 in 2000-3000 new borns.
Fragile X syndrome because it affects 1 in 3600 males and 1 in 4000 to 6000 females with full mutation worldwide.
Huntington’s disease because in Western countries, it’s estimated that about five to seven people per 100,000 are affected by HD.
All these diseases, like autism, are genetic in origin. All are more rare.
Of course the other thing autism advocates and autism advocacy organizations can do is shut their mouths to keep themselves and the autism community from looking stupid. But it doesn’t look like that is going to happen anytime soon.
Replies to this editorial are welcome.
Editorial #235 Quote #15
Autism Politico has another quote to by A. Maclaren, D.D. for you: ”We cannot erase the sad records of our past.”
What is done is done. That is why we need to ask ourselves each day that we go forward “What legacy will I leave?” or “What example am I setting?” or “Am I doing something which is going to reflect poorly upon myself and people who depend on me.”
People who lead the autism community need to follow these dictums so that they can model appropriate behavior for those whom they serve. Yet many people who are now leading the autism community do not follow these dictums. That is something to think about. Who do you want leading you and those like you? Who do you want representing you to influential people? Who do you want negotiating policy for your autistic children?
Perhaps it would be a good idea to hold autism advocates and advocacy groups accountable to higher standards. If these advocates and advocacy groups are of good character, they won’t mind.
Replies to this editorial are welcome.
Editorial #234: Quote #14
Autism Politico has another quote for you: ”Water run by will not turn a mill.” A. Maclaren, D.D.
What does this mean for us?
It means we should do today what we have the chance to do today, and not let today pass into tomorrow. It means if you are twiddling your thumbs and not accomplishing anything, you are wasting your energy.
If you are in dire circumstances and aren’t doing anything to get yourself out of them, then it means you are partly to blame for your problems.
Another way to look at this is to examine what the advocates in the autism community are doing for you. They may exist. They may have websites. Their members may participate in chats and groups. But what are they actually doing for you? Perhaps you should be demanding more of these people who ask for YOUR support, or YOUR money, or for YOUR assistance. After all, aren’t these people here to serve you?
Replies to this editorial are welcome.
Editorial #233: Own Up or Shut Up
Autism Politico has a message for some of those autism advocates who have been clamoring for the public display of Osama Bin Laden’s death photos…
Perhaps it would be in their own interests if they shut their mouths.
These autism advocates don’t like it when blogs quote or put up screen shots of autism advocates or autism advocacy groups involved in questionable activities or alleged misdeeds. They don’t like it when people read those blogs and comment bout those questionable activities and alleged misdeeds.
Well, do these autism advocates think their own hypocrisy is dignified?
These autism advocates might think there is a significant difference between trotting out Bin Laden’s death photos and posting quotes they have made, but is there really a difference at all? If people feel they were hurt by what Bin Laden did and want to see proof of his death and comment on them, and if people feel they have been hurt by autism advocates and want to see proof of the perceived affronts posted publicly and be able to comment on them, what’s the difference?
Replies to this editorial are welcome.
Editorial #232: Hey Autism Advocacy Organizations! Pick a Side!
Autism Politico knows autism advocates and autism advocacy organizations read this blog because we’ve seen you talking about us in your groups, pages, forums, and chat rooms, and so if you are a member of an autism advocacy organization, or a supporter of an autism advocate, or have given your money or time to one, or bought a book written by them, you may want to ask them why they aren’t commenting on anything that is written here.
Autism Politico knows why it is. We make them nervous. That’s why. And today we are going to make them nervous again.
Autism Politico is not going to tell its readers where it stands on the issue of abortion, but will instead ask autism advocacy organizations to declare where they stand on this issue.
The reason we’re doing this is because we’re tired of hearing pro-choice advocates and pro-choice members of autistic advocacy organizations whining in pitiful tones about how terrible it is that a genetic test for autism will soon allow women to abort fetuses with autistic DNA. The view that these advocacy organizations seem to have is that abortion is the greatest thing in the world as long as it’s only fetuses with neurotypical DNA that are getting the chop.
That hacking a fetus to pieces may be immoral, unethical, or irreligious never seems to enter their heads. That a woman seeking an abortion might have been raped never seems to enter their heads either.
In other words, autism advocates and autism advocacy organizations seem to want to have it both ways. They want to preserve the rights of autistic fetuses. They want to preserve the rights of women to choose whether or not to have an abortion, but they don’t give a crap about neurotypical fetuses (and if you think of it, the more neurotypicals that don’t get born, the more the population of autistics will increase if elective abortions of autistic fetuses is banned).
And so Autism Politico is calling upon all the autism advocates and autism advocacy organizations to take a stand and declare themselves. We want them to give us definitive statements like:
“We are against the elective abortion of autistic fetuses, but we strongly support the right of women to abort fetuses with neurotypical DNA.”
or
“As long as it’s only neurotypical fetuses getting chopped to pieces, we don’t care.”
The issue is a simple one. You simply tell people what you think. Why are we bring this up now? Because the issue is coming to the forefront: Some states in the US are now cutting funds to women’s clinics.
Gov. Mitch Daniels of Indiana said Friday that he would sign a bill cutting off Medicaid financing for Planned Parenthood, a move that lawmakers in several states have begun pondering as a new approach in the battle over abortion. Indiana becomes the first state to go forward.
<snip>
Indiana’s bill includes other provisions aimed at limiting abortion. Among them: a ban on abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy in most cases rather than an earlier standard of viability, which was often determined by doctors to be several weeks later. Several states, including Nebraska, Kansas and Oklahoma, have recently set earlier limits.
The time for autism advocates and autism advocacy organizations to make a name for themselves by either supporting or fighting against these measures is now. But you will not see them make a move. Why? because they want your money and your support, that’s why. And when they get your money, what they will advocate against is the selective abortion of autistic fetuses, thereby limiting a women’s choice. This is what is called neurodiversity.
Replies to this editorial are welcome.